当前离线
- 注册时间
- 2011-12-20
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 帖子
- 积分
- 93640
- 主题
|
xhandy 发表于 2012-9-11 01:50
Potter是很好的选择,芝柏三金桥陀飞轮的颠覆性更强,当然还有很多稀世逸品也不遑多让.......不过都是纸上 ...
说到波特和竞赛表,钟博士又有一番宏论:
“Potter是更好的投资品,起码他的战绩在拍卖还是其他二手市场都表现不俗。不论一块波特被保养得多坏,它始终是波特,除非被屠宰了。对于任何一块竞赛表,除了当初的较表师本人给做的保养外,任何人做的保养都是对这块表的亵渎。那些较表师总是不愿意分享他们的法宝,我见过一块被不同的较表师流传的一块竞赛表,状态实在是一流,如果我还能碰见的话,我肯定会下手。
一块竞赛表就像是一瓶经年累月的好酒,状态好不好关系到储藏的方法。我怀疑在二手市场中是否还有这样出身的好表,所以,一块波特令你与竞赛表的距离更接近,而且没有哪一块流通的波特被人动过手脚。因此,一块流通的波特通常比一块流通的竞赛表更可心,但是两者都值得珍藏。”
原文:
I think Potter is a better investment, at least in a public sale. This is becuase no matter how badly a Potter is serviced it's still a Potter unless it gets really butchered. Any service to a trials watch, except by the regleur who did the final adjustment essentially ruiins its superior characteristics. The regluers had lots of tricks, which they did not share. This is applying logic and a rationale to collecting, which is rarely a good guide. I know of at least one trial watch that has always been owned by watchmakers who understood what it was so if I could buy it I would.
A trials watch is like a bottle of very expensive old wine, Whether is is still fine wine or vinegar depends on how it was stored which is rarely knowable. I doubt the trials watches with such a provinence ever reach the opne market With a Potter watch what you see is a lot closer to what you get assuming it has not been altered to "upgrade" it. Thus, an open market Potter, in my view, is a better thing to have than an open market trials watch but both are still very very desirable. |
评分
-
查看全部评分
|