【Roger Dubuis】不再错过--双日内瓦印记18K白金豪爵(新上机芯特写)

<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>shek329</i>在2010-7-27 1:22:00的发言：</b><br/>
<p>不是说，另一枚是天文台吗？</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>GENEVASEAL与COSC没有关系</p>

<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>般若</i>在2010-7-26 23:15:00的发言：</b><br/>
<p>这只表两个日内瓦印记都是打色的。</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>GENEVASEAL也有作伪（古旧表）和装饰（新表）两种，真正的GENEVASEAL有“秘属”</p>

<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>shek329</i>在2010-7-28 3:28:00的发言：</b><br/>
<p>天文台不一定是COSC，COSC只是精密计时证明的最普遍一种。当然，萧邦的双印记有COSC，豪爵没有。</p>
<p>有种老说法是：双印记是天文台级精度，因为日内瓦印记的守则主要针对材料工艺，不针对走时精度。</p></div>
<p><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><font size="4"><span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>Observatory chronometer</span>起源于<span lang="EN-US" style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>18</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>世纪的英国,"COSC"是1973年开始瑞士联邦对国内所有精密时计的一种"统一认证"制度.</span></font><font size="4"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>GENEVASEAL只适用于法语区的日内瓦州</span></font></p>
<p><font size="4"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;></span></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p><font size="4"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 14pt; FONT-FAMILY: 新宋体; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times new=" New? AR-SA? mso-bidi-language: ZH-CN; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: 1.0pt; mso-font-kerning: Roman?;>至于,"老说法：双印记是天文台级精度"很可能是某些饭局中"透露"给港台媒体人以供"领会"的建议吧</span></font></p>

[此贴子已经被作者于2010-7-28 9:30:21编辑过]

<div class="msgheader">QUOTE:</div><div class="msgborder"><b>以下是引用<i>bastian</i>在2010-7-28 10:22:00的发言：</b><br/>那到底是啥意思啊。。。 </div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>说的直接一点,古老的双印记可能是DIY的结果,新表双印记(甚至三印记),其中一枚(甚至两枚)印记可能仅仅是"装饰"作用...</p>

[此贴子已经被作者于2010-7-28 10:36:00编辑过]